On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 04:59:13PM +0200, Bernd Markgraf wrote: > that's indeed not so good... the ietf mib reports them OL but misses some > values. like the 3 input phases, temperature etc and gives me > battery.runtime.low of 1 which i think is not that good either...
Ooops, I really must bem in here. Long long time ago I have reworked the snmp-ups to handle 3-phase for both IETF and PowerWare mibs, but I never gor around to committing them. Actually I have used them in production for more than a year now :-( (on a PW 9390 with SNMP card) On the other hand, I am off for three weeks of vacation starting sunday so even it I could commit them to the trunk, I will not be around to handle any horrors this may result in. So I see two options: either I commit it, and leave the rest of you with sorting any problems out, or I just mail my patch to relevant persons on this list ... /Niels -- Niels Baggesen - @home - Århus - Denmark - [EMAIL PROTECTED] The purpose of computing is insight, not numbers --- R W Hamming _______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
