2012/8/1 Greg Vickers <daehe...@iinet.net.au> > Hi Arnaud, >
Hi Greg, > On 31/07/12 01:02, Arnaud Quette wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > 2012/7/29 Greg Vickers <daehe...@iinet.net.au> > >> On 22/07/12 20:14, Greg Vickers wrote: >> >>> Hi Arnaud, >>> >>> On 18/07/12 20:59, Arnaud Quette wrote: >>> >>>> I've just made a quick test on an Opengear ACM 50004-2 (ARM supervision >>>> appliance). >>>> For the record: >>>> - uname -a: Linux acm5004-2 2.6.30.2-uc0 #1 Tue Feb 15 09:30:54 EST >>>> 2011 armv4tl unknown >>>> - nut version: 2.4.3 (so bcmxcp_usb 0.23) >>>> - tried with a PW5110 (ups.firmware: Cont:00.50 Inve:01.50) >>>> >>>> and everything worked like a charm. >>>> That said, Charles and Kjell comments are fully valid. >>>> That is, try with the latest version (2.6.4). It has at least more >>>> debug traces to help getting visibility. >>>> >>> I've tested with nut 2.6.4, with the same result, i.e. this driver can't >>> communicate with the UPS. >>> >>> What switches should I use with the driver to provide you the debug >>> information? More -D switches? >>> >>>> Could you perhaps test the 5110 on your Ubuntu system, with a recent >>>> NUT? >>>> >>> OK, tested on the Ubuntu system and it works just fine! My PW5110 has >>> the same firmware versions as yours, and the Ubuntu system I tested on has >>> kernel 3.2.0 on it and nut 2.6.3. I'll see if I can get kernel 3.2.0 on >>> the RaspberryPi and report back. >>> >> >> I've got kernel 3.2.0 on the RaspberryPi and nut 2.6.4 and the >> bcmxcp_usb driver reports the same problem :( >> > > damn, this would lead me to also think about a kernel or libusb issue. > > just to be sure, is bcmxcp_usb linked against libusb *0.1* and not > 1.0-compat? > > $ ldd bcmxcp_usb > /usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libcofi_rpi.so (0x401b4000) > libusb-0.1.so.4 => /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libusb-0.1.so.4 > (0x4014f000) > libpthread.so.0 => /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libpthread.so.0 > (0x40068000) > libc.so.6 => /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libc.so.6 (0x401bd000) > /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/ld-linux.so.3 => /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3 > (0x40037000) > > So yes, looks like it's linked to libusb 0.1. > yes, I confirm it. > I'm going to go with the last option I have, and will replace this UPS >> with one that works with this combination of architecture and OS! :) > > > yup, still an option ;) > > Thanks for your help! > welcome! cheers, Arnaud -- Linux / Unix / Opensource Engineering Expert - Eaton - http://opensource.eaton.com Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.fr
_______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser