On Sep 2, 2015, at 5:54 PM, John Thurston <john.thurs...@alaska.gov> wrote: > > But what about that "Bypass Paralleling Switchboard"? I suspect it is > possible that it could be used to ignore the input from UPS-A and rely only > on UPS-B to handle the load. If I'm only monitoring the status of the UPSs, > how will I know that having UPS-A OL and 100% is irrelevant? Does anyone know > how to incorporate the state of this "paralleling" component into my NUT > monitoring?
Hi John, I am not qualified to offer any advice about that bypass system (I try not to touch anything bigger than 120V/15A), but since nobody else has piped up yet: if you can get details from your clients about how that works conceptually, we can help map that into a NUT configuration. The big question in my mind is whether there is some way to programmatically determine what state the circuit is in. If not, there is still probably a way to manually use the dummy-ups driver to add in a phantom UPS representing the parallel-fed state. -- Charles Lepple clepple@gmail _______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
