http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614





--- Comment #70 from Nicholas Tung <gatoatigrado gmail com>  2009-01-04 
21:39:44 ---
(In reply to comment #69)
> > another point is whether okular should be so sensitive to mime types.

typically, file formats have data stream identifiers which don't require file
extensions to trigger a system mime type [in order to open the files], no? I
thought zip archives had comment fields; maybe worth investigating.

> > I think it should transparently replace the ~/.kde/.../___.xml files,
> No. The metadata loaded in the document archive are specific to the document 
> in
> _that_ archive, not in any other document.

I understand, I didn't mean all ~/.../.xml files. I meant that adding new
annotation for a okular document archive should not generate new
~/.kde/.../.okular.xml files, but instead save it to the archive, if that
hasn't been done already. Sorry I don't know what actually happens because it's
not working on my system at the moment.

regards, Nicholas


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel

Reply via email to