On my box: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/lib$ ls -l libXt* -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 429164 2007-05-21 08:27 libXt.a lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 2007-10-22 22:27 libXt.so -> libXt.so.6.0.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 2007-10-21 13:46 libXt.so.6 -> libXt.so.6.0.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 326564 2007-05-21 08:27 libXt.so.6.0.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 17630 2007-11-14 06:05 libXtst.a lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 2008-02-13 18:11 libXtst.so -> libXtst.so.6.1.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 2008-02-13 18:11 libXtst.so.6 -> libXtst.so.6.1.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 17500 2007-11-14 06:05 libXtst.so.6.1.0
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 10:43 PM, Bill Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alfredo, > > > ... > > > I have a box with Ubuntu (currently running 8.04 alpha). > > I see the symbolic link to libXt.so.6 > > > > Maybe it is the box you are testing on. Maybe somebody > > else can verify that the link is there in 7.10. > > Just to be precise could you confirm that you see *both* > > > libXt.so.6 -> libXt.so.6.0.0 > > and > > libXt.so -> libXt.so.6.0.0 > > symbolic links in /usr/lib? > > I only see the first one, but the open-axiom configure looks for the second > one. > > I am actually building open-axiom using the new release candidate for > the KDE version of andLinux under Windows. It runs ubuntu 7.10 with > colinux. My understanding is that it exactly the same as the native > ubuntu distribution, but perhaps that is not the case. > > Regards, > Bill Page. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ open-axiom-devel mailing list open-axiom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-axiom-devel
