James> Does the ib_req_notify_cq() kernel verb conform the James> definition of the Request Completion Notification in James> section 11.4.2.2 of the IBTA spec?
James> Specifically, is the handler only guaranteed to be called James> after the next completion entry is added? Yes, I think these should be semantics we assume. James> I understand that Mellanox hardware can generate James> notification if there are already completions on the CQ, James> but I want to avoid using any hardware specific features. I agree - we should not assume the stronger Mellanox semantics. - R. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general