On 27.01.2024 16:15, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> Class-based I2C probing requires detect() and address_list to be
> set in the I2C client driver, see checks in i2c_detect().
> It's misleading to declare I2C_CLASS_HWMON support if this
> precondition isn't met.
>
Any feedback here? Should this better go through the I2C tree?
> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallwe...@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ipmb.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ipmb.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ipmb.c
> index 4e335832f..9e5c6d682 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ipmb.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ipmb.c
> @@ -567,7 +567,6 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id ipmi_ipmb_id[] = {
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, ipmi_ipmb_id);
>
> static struct i2c_driver ipmi_ipmb_driver = {
> - .class = I2C_CLASS_HWMON,
> .driver = {
> .name = DEVICE_NAME,
> .of_match_table = of_ipmi_ipmb_match,
_______________________________________________
Openipmi-developer mailing list
Openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openipmi-developer
