On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 12:23:47 GMT, Marius Hanl <mh...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I'd say .forEach() is used correctly here, according to docs, it guarantees >> execution of the side-effects (add to removed list & clear index), just not >> in any particular order. This way we avoid multiple iteration. > > Another idea is to use `toList()`, which is a very efficient operation and > then iterate over it. > In the java.util.stream package > [docs](https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/16/docs/api/java.base/java/util/stream/package-summary.html#SideEffects) > it is mentioned that `forEach()` method operates only via side-effects. So > do you think we should avoid using `forEach()` here and iterate the generated > list separately to clear selected index? `forEach` is used correctly here. From the docs: > With the exception of terminal operations > [forEach](https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/21/docs/api/java.base/java/util/stream/Stream.html#forEach(java.util.function.Consumer)) > and > [forEachOrdered](https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/21/docs/api/java.base/java/util/stream/Stream.html#forEachOrdered(java.util.function.Consumer)), > side-effects of behavioral parameters may not always be executed when the > stream implementation can optimize away the execution of behavioral > parameters without affecting the result of the computation. > Another idea is to use `toList()`, which is a very efficient operation and > then iterate over it. That's still 2 iterations. If the code is not performance-critical it doesn't matter. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1430#discussion_r1541140317
