On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 10:33:58 GMT, Lukasz Kostyra <lkost...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> JFX minimum requirements guarantee 9Ex availability, so old non-Ex paths are 
> no longer needed.
> 
> In multiple parts (ex. Mesh, Graphics, etc.) where the Device is acquired I 
> changed the type to explicitly use `IDirect3DDevice9Ex`. Technically it 
> doesn't matter much (`IDirect3DDevice9Ex` inherits `IDirect3DDevice` - it was 
> leveraged to transparently use the Ex device in the backend) but now we don't 
> have the non-Ex device, so that keeps it a bit more consistent and clear IMO.
> 
> Verified by running tests on Windows 11, did not notice any regressions. 
> Unfortunately I have no way to test this on older systems.

I tried to run the 3DLighting application and I'm getting an error. However, it 
looks like it's not this patch that is causing it since going back a few 
commits also gives this error. The jfx22 branch doesn't have this issue so it 
will take some investigation to find out what's going on. I'm on Win 10.


#
# A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
#
#  EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION (0xc0000005) at pc=0x000001b44b9ad260, pid=6332, 
tid=18096
#
# JRE version: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (21.0.1+12) (build 21.0.1+12-29)
# Java VM: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (21.0.1+12-29, mixed mode, sharing, tiered, 
compressed oops, compressed class ptrs, g1 gc, windows-amd64)
# Problematic frame:
# J 170 c2 java.lang.String.length()I java.base@21.0.1 (11 bytes) @ 
0x000001b44b9ad260 [0x000001b44b9ad220+0x0000000000000040]
#
# No core dump will be written. Minidumps are not enabled by default on client 
versions of Windows
#
# An error report file with more information is saved as:
# C:\Users\Nir\git\jfx\tests\performance\3DLighting\hs_err_pid6332.log
[5.830s][warning][os] Loading hsdis library failed
#
# If you would like to submit a bug report, please visit:
#   https://bugreport.java.com/bugreport/crash.jsp
#

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1445#issuecomment-2076903265

Reply via email to