Am Mon, 12 Feb 2018 18:10:29 -0800 schrieb Quanah Gibson-Mount <qua...@symas.com>:
> --On Tuesday, February 13, 2018 9:31 AM +1000 William Brown > <wibr...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, 2018-02-12 at 14:30 +0100, Michael Ströder wrote: > >> HI! > >> > >> To me this rationale for SMTP submission with implicit TLS seems > >> also applicable to LDAPS vs. StartTLS: > >> > >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8314#appendix-A > >> > >> So LDAPS should not be considered deprecated. Rather it should be > >> recommended and the _optional_ use of StartTLS should be strongly > >> discouraged. > > > > Yes, I strongly agree with this. I have evidence to this fact and > > can provide it if required, > > Personally, I'm all for it. I'd suggest using the above RFC as a > template for one formalizing port 636, so it's finally a documented > standard. We have had discussed this topic some 10 years ago, at that time Kurt had some concerns with regard to ldaps and port 636. Unfortunately I can't remember details. -Dieter -- Dieter Klünter | Systemberatung http://sys4.de GPG Key ID: E9ED159B 53°37'09,95"N 10°08'02,42"E