On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 07:21:57AM +1000, Tim Hudson wrote: > > This isn't about the OTC meeting itself - this is about the details of the > topic actually being captured within the PR. > You need to actually look at the PR to form a view. And we do add to the > PRs during the discussion if things come up and we review the PR details. > So the vote isn't about an OTC discussion - the vote is precisely about the > PR itself. > > One of the things we have explicitly discussed on multiple calls is that in > order to be informed of the details, you need to consult the PR which has a > record of the discussion and often viewpoints that offer rather different > positions on a topic - and those viewpoints are what should be being > considered.
I am happy to read the issue/PR to see the different view points. But different viewpoints is exactly the problem, which of those am I voting for? During a meeting, there probably was a consensus about what you're actually voting for, but that information is lost. In general, I want a vote to be about what is going to change, the how isn't important most of the time. Kurt