Hi, Well, curently there is an operationalState specified into the subnets in IFA005/IFA006, but it was not specified what should happen when a subnet is disabled. This is what was commented in the joint meeting between ETSI NFV and OpenStack in Denver. During the discussions to resolve this issue we considered the suggestion to remove the state completly and decided for the removal.
By he way I use the api-ref [1] more, than the wiki. I believe it contains better information and for me it looks better. [1]: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/network/v2/#show-subnet-details Br, Gerg0 From: Gary Kotton [mailto:gkot...@vmware.com] Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2017 10:05 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [etsinfv][neutron][gap-09]: No state for subnets Hi, Can you please elaborate more about the subnet state? FYI - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/APIv2-specification#Subnet Thanks Gary From: "Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)" <gergely.csat...@nokia.com<mailto:gergely.csat...@nokia.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 3:13 PM To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: [openstack-dev] [etsinfv][neutron][gap-09]: No state for subnets Hi, During the discussions in NFV#20 about the subnet state we argeed, that we should remove the state from the specification of subnets in IFA005 and IFA006. This invalidates [GAP-09] in [1]. Br, Gerg0 [1]: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ptg-denver-etsi-nfv-tst003-gaps-explained
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
