Hey everybody,
Wanted to send a quick note to let people know that all OpenStack
services are more than welcome to put any openstacksdk proxy and
resource classes they have directly into the openstacksdk tree.
Looking through codesearch.openstack.org, masakariclient and tricircle
each have SDK-related classes in their trees.
You don't HAVE to put the code into openstacksdk. In fact, I wrote a
patch for masakariclient to register the classes with
openstack.connection.Connection:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/534883/
But I wanted to be clear that the code is **welcome** directly in tree,
and that anyone working on an OpenStack service is welcome to put
support code directly in the openstacksdk tree.
Monty
PS. Joe - you've also got some classes in the tricircle test suite
extending the network service. I haven't followed all the things ... are
the tricircle network extensions done as neutron plugins now? (It looks
like they are) If so, why don't we figure out getting your network
resources in-tree as well.
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
