On 03/10/2015 12:56 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > Hi all, > > I saw the following on > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-rabbit-queue and was wondering > if there was more explanation of why? > > The StackTach team is switching from Kombu to Pika (at the > recommendation of core rabbitmq devs). Hopefully oslo-messaging will do > the same. > > I'm wondering why/what? > > Pika seems to be less supported, has less support for things other than > rabbitmq, and seems less developed (it lacks python 3.3 support > apparently).
So, something that came up was the supporting anything other MQ system than Rabbit seemed irrelevant to the operator community. Rabbit is bad, all others are demonstrably worse. Anything that makes the Rabbit path better is good, anything that could regress the Rabbit path for the sake of any of the other backends is bad (and also not useful to deployers). > What's the details on this idea listed there? > > Any stachtack folks got any more details? > > -Josh > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Sean Dague http://dague.net __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
