Hello, Bin, Understand your expectation. In Tricircle big-tent application: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/338796/, a proposal was also given to add plugin mechnism in Nova/Cinder API layer, just like Neutron support plugin mechanism in API layer, that boosts innovation for different backend implementation to be supported, from ODL to OVN, Open Contrail....
Mobile edging computing, NFV netwoking, distributed edge cloud etc are some new scneario for OpenStack, I suggest to have at least two successive dedicated design summit sessions to discuss about that f2f, the topics to be discussed could be: 1, Use cases 2, Requirements in detail 3, Gaps in OpenStack 4, Proposal to be discussed Arhietcture level proposal discussion 1, Proposals 2, Pros. and Cons. comparation 3, Chellenges 4, next step Looking forward to your thoughts. Best Regards Chaoyi Huang(joehuang) ________________________________________ From: HU, BIN [bh5...@att.com] Sent: 28 August 2016 2:16 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][massively distributed][architecture]Coordination between actions/WGs The challenge in OpenStack is how to enable the innovation built on top of OpenStack. So telco use cases is not only the innovation built on top of OpenStack. Instead, telco use cases, e.g. Gluon (NFV networking), vCPE Cloud, Mobile Cloud, Mobile Edge Cloud, brings the needed requirement for innovation in OpenStack itself. If OpenStack don't address those basic requirements, the innovation will never happen on top of OpenStack. An example is - self-driving car is built on top of many technologies, such as sensor/camera, AI, maps, middleware etc. All innovations in each technology (sensor/camera, AI, map, etc.) bring together the innovation of self-driving car. WE NEED INNOVATION IN OPENSTACK in order to enable the innovation built on top of OpenStack. Thanks Bin -----Original Message----- From: Edward Leafe [mailto:e...@leafe.com] Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2016 10:49 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][massively distributed][architecture]Coordination between actions/WGs On Aug 27, 2016, at 12:18 PM, HU, BIN <bh5...@att.com> wrote: >> From telco perspective, those are the areas that allow innovation, and >> provide telco customers with new types of services. > > We need innovation, starting from not limiting ourselves from bringing new > idea and new use cases, and bringing those impossibility to reality. There is innovation in OpenStack, and there is innovation in things built on top of OpenStack. We are simply trying to keep the two layers from getting confused. -- Ed Leafe __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
