Hi! It's worth pointing out that GitHub's designers jump straight into Pull Requests, designing right alongside developers. Zach Holman gave a great talk about their process which included how everyone works together seamlessly with autonomy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyz3jkOBbQY -- Kyle On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Toshiyuki Hayashi <haya...@ntti3.com>wrote: > Hi, > > I really understand and share Gabriel's concern, but now GitHub has > become familiar for web design people as well, at least it is the most > popular service in those kind of services. > Also G+ community which using now is not suitable for discussions, > difficult to track threads, share images or texts and read through. I > believe GitHub is the best solution for now. > > Regards, > Toshiyuki > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Jaromir Coufal <jcou...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > Guys, thank you for the discussion, I have some points here (comments > inside > > the mail) > > > > > > On 2013/18/06 17:25, Julie Pichon wrote: > > > > "Gabriel Hurley" <gabriel.hur...@nebula.com> wrote: > > > > I've been hoping some of the more design-oriented folks would weigh in on > > this issue, but that hasn't particularly happened... > > > > It seems there are already a few of them on the G+ community, it would be > > worthwhile to also have this conversation in the current community and > see > > if people agree with the problem and are interested in trying out a new > > option. I started a thread pointing to this one over there. > > > > Yeah, the idea and conversation started there originally. However there > is > > not much activity yet and there was no reply. So the question lies there > for > > few weeks already. Hopefully there will be some reaction on revived post. > > > > > > My concern is that as engineers we're all comfortable with GitHub, but > that > > it will end up being an impediment or discouragement for people who fall > > more on the creative side. I don't disagree with the benefits as stated > and > > I'm willing to give any solution a try, but I want to be careful that we > > don't alienate a portion of the contributors by our choice of tools. > > > > I share with this concern, although I also very much agree with Jaromir > on > > the downsides of the current setup. > > > > I completely understand and share the concern as well. > > > > However, my thinking is... GitHub is mainly for developers, but not only > for > > them. And it is just about registration to GitHub to be active and be > able > > to comment there, nothing more (even more, you see all the issues without > > registration). > > What I love about that is not just having better format for discussions, > but > > also getting closer to main development stream. So the people who are > > creative and might help with UX improvement ideas, gets also to the > reality > > of implementation and in the end hopefully these two streams would meet > > together - which would be amazing result. Both can learn from each other. > > > > Because, the same concern occurs when we try to move Horizon development > > oriented people to discussions on G+ community. > > > > Cheers, > > -- Jarda > > > > Cheers, > > > > Julie > > > > In general I leave it to the community, though. :-) > > > > - Gabriel > > > > -- > Toshiyuki Hayashi > NTT Innovation Institute Inc. > Tel:650-579-0800 ex4292 > mail:haya...@ntti3.com > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack > Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp