+1 - I endorse installing LuCI in snapshot builds. - A significant fraction of people will wind up installing LuCI anyway. - It's a FAQ on the forum. "I just installed a snapshot build, but there's no web GUI." (This even bites me from time to time...) - LuCI poses less of a space concern (in the days of 4MByte Flash, it might have made a difference - no more.) - People who're intentionally working on small Flash systems are rolling their own builds anyway. - It's one fewer configuration option in our build process
Thanks for asking about this, Paul. Rich > On May 7, 2024, at 5:24 PM, Paul Spooren <m...@aparcar.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > For some reason (resource usage?) our snapshot builds do not include the LuCI > web interface. I think it’s an advantage to have LuCI installed in snapshot > images since a) it installed for all releases anyway and b) often it’s just > nice to have the web interface directly available. > > Is anyone against having the interface installed by default? I remember from > multiple (in-person) discussion with fellow developers, that they’d prefer it > being installed. > > If it’s an oversight I’d like to see it added to the default packages (via > the builedbot config), if there’s a reason to keep it from snapshots, I’d > like to understand the details. > > Thanks, > Paul > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
