On 01/31/2018 09:13 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > On 01/31/2018 09:02 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >> Hi, >> >> In the gluster maintainers meeting last week, one of the topics touched >> upon was, should we build CentOS6 client packages for 4.0? >> >> The reasoning being, upgrading servers to 4.0 requires moving from >> CentOS6 (for installations on this base OS version) to CentOS7 and then >> moving to 4.0 bits on CentOS7. >> >> The same across clients would be further tedious. >> >> As a result (and based on glusterd2 not being a part of the client >> packages), should we build and release CentOS6 client packages for 4.0 >> via the CentOS Storage SIG? >> >> This does not mean we run regression tests using CentOS6 clients, like >> we never ran using CentOS7 bits in our regressions till date. >> >> Packaging team, thoughts? and what would it take to make it happen? If >> agreed upon can it be done for RC0 itself? > > Since glusterd2 looks like it will be packaged separate from glusterfs > we can probably continue to build and distribute glusterfs for el6 from > the CentOS Storage SIG. > > And if EPEL has a golang compiler we should be able to do scratch builds > of glusterd2 packages and distribute that via download.gluster.org.
scratch builds in Fedora's koji build system. > > I haven't tried any of this; it's mainly a thought experiment. > > -- > > Kaleb > _______________________________________________ > maintainers mailing list > maintain...@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > _______________________________________________ packaging mailing list packaging@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging