Hey Heinrich, On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 11:01:29 +0100 Heinrich Müller <heinrich.mueller82-gM/Ye1E23mwN +bqq9rb...@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Am 09.02.2013 23:36, schrieb Petr Kovar: > > Hi all, > > > > I was wondering what is others' take on Pan bug 693272? > > > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693272 > > > > It indeed looks like we can't feature linking to a LGPLv3 library > > (gnutls2/3) due to the license incompatibility, which is very unfortunate. > > > > Getting permission from all code contributors to relicense the code to > > "GPLv2 or later" doesn't seem to be very realistic either. > > > > > This sucks. > I frankly didn't notice before, but perhaps we could license pan under > LGPL3? I think that nowadays it's still the GPLv2 or later that would allow us to use / link most GPL/LGPL software out there... > I'm not familiar with the legal mumbo-jumno involved in this. > Could you ask Charles / are you familiar with this ? I'll try asking Charles on IRC. Will see. Cheers, Petr Kovar _______________________________________________ Pan-devel mailing list Pan-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-devel