Hi Rick,
Looks like it's in the reader, as rolling back all of the changes
between now and then fixes. I'll see if I can isolate what went wrong.
Now might be a good time to add a regression test as well.
Burlen
Rick Angelini(CISD/CIV) wrote:
I have a CTH 8.1 dataset that I'm loading up using a development
version of Paraview. When I load up the data and use the "Extract
CTH Parts" filter, everything seems to work fine with the exception of
some unexpected holes in the resulting geometry. Due to the
shape of the holes, I'd say that it looks like Paraview is not
collecting all of the extracted features from the servers. I have
a build from the CVS repository from April that works fine - but the
builds I have from August CVS downloads have the missing
geometry/holes.
So, at this point, I don't know if it a problem with the CTH reader,
the "Extract CTH Parts" filter, or some oddity of OpenMPI that I built
against.
Just to verify that the data itself is OK, I've done a couple of tests:
- if I load up the data running only 1 pvserver, the geometry looks
fine, although quite slow to load! 8-)
- if I create a slice through the original geometry on the at the same
location as one of the holes, the resulting clip plane is correct.
Any recent changes to either the CTH reader or CTH part extract
function that might explain this?
_______________________________________________
ParaView mailing list
ParaView@paraview.org
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
--
Burlen Loring
Kitware, Inc.
R&D Engineer
28 Corporate Drive
Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662
Phone: 518-371-3971 x137
_______________________________________________
ParaView mailing list
ParaView@paraview.org
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
