Benson, I won't be able to provide you with the dataset you are requesting since the IP is protected. I might be able to provide it to Kitware for debugging purposes with the condition of not distributing it to any third parties. However, I can access your request to share the benchmarking code. Please find attached the code I am using for my benchmark. Hope you will find it useful. Nonetheless, I would it useful if someone could point me towards a resolution of the issue I reported in my original email. Regards, Frank. From: Benson Muite [mailto:benson_mu...@yahoo.com] Sent: Montag, 26. September 2016 11:30 To: Albina, Frank; paraview@paraview.org Cc: Del Citto, Francesco Subject: Re: [Paraview] Paraview v5.1.2: SurfaceLIC & software rendering issues
Both would be great if possible. On 09/26/2016 12:22 PM, Albina, Frank wrote: Benson, do you need the data and the example code, or only the example code? Frank. From: Benson Muite [mailto:benson_mu...@yahoo.com] Sent: Montag, 26. September 2016 11:17 To: Albina, Frank; paraview@paraview.org<mailto:paraview@paraview.org> Cc: Del Citto, Francesco Subject: Re: [Paraview] Paraview v5.1.2: SurfaceLIC & software rendering issues Hi, Is the benchmark available? Would be interested in looking at this if possible to get example code. Regards, Benson On 09/26/2016 11:55 AM, Albina, Frank wrote: Dear all, I have downloaded from the paraview.org the latest binaries for Linux of ParaView v5.1.2. My main purpose is to make use of ParaView with software rendering in a clustered environment without GPU and, as such, I have been going through my small benchmark on a generic F1 car. This what I have found so far when generating a SurfaceLIC representation on the whole car surface in batch mode. Using pvbatch -mesa-llvm works fine. This is one of the produced images for reference: [cid:image001.jpg@01D21801.1883A400] Using 4 cores to perform the same task (with the same script) with mpiexec -np 4 pvbatch --mesa-llvm shows a good speed-up but the background is black instead of white (although view.Backgound = [1,1,1] is set explicitely), as shown hereafter: [cid:image002.jpg@01D21801.1883A400] On the same server (Intel Xeon ES-2650 v3), the CPU is AVX2 capable, so I tried also the same script with pvbatch --mesa-swr-avx2. The image background is corrupted with leftover frames apparently, as shown hereafter: [cid:image003.jpg@01D21801.1883A400] Was this behavior to be expected? Please let me know if there is any interest in providing with my benchmark. Frank Albina _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com<http://www.kitware.com> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
renderBenchmarkSurfaceLIC.py
Description: renderBenchmarkSurfaceLIC.py
_______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
