Same here. I think the unnecessarily complicated unsubscription system might be broken. I can't reach the next step after pasting the confirmation string. Not to mention that *there is a next step* after clicking a link in a confirmation email and then pasting the confirmation string. Whose idea was it to make unsubscribing more secure than most banking web sites? :)
--- Yaman Özakın *<:^) Research Assistant - Geophysics earth.usc.edu/~ozakin/ University of Southern California On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 3:37 PM, yaman ozakin <oza...@usc.edu> wrote: > Same here. > > I think the unnecessarily complicated unsubscription system might be > broken. I can't reach the next step after pasting the confirmation string. > Not to mention that *there is a next step* after clicking a link in a > confirmation email and then pasting the confirmation string. Whose idea was > it to make unsubscribing more secure than most banking web sites? :) > > --- > Yaman Özakın *<:^) > Research Assistant - Geophysics > earth.usc.edu/~ozakin/ > University of Southern California > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 2:58 PM, Ott Richard <richard....@erdw.ethz.ch> > wrote: > >> come on! I've unsubscribed 3 times now, why do I still get these mails??? >> >> >> Richard Ott >> ETH Zürich >> PhD student >> >> Sonneggstrasse 5 >> >> 8092 Zürich >> >> +41 44 633 89 06 >> richard....@erdw.ethz.ch >> >> ________________________________________ >> Von: ParaView [paraview-boun...@paraview.org]" im Auftrag von & >> quot;paraview-requ...@paraview.org [paraview-requ...@paraview.org] >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. Februar 2018 18:00 >> An: paraview@paraview.org >> Betreff: ParaView Digest, Vol 166, Issue 7 >> >> Send ParaView mailing list submissions to >> paraview@paraview.org >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__paravie >> w.org_mailman_listinfo_paraview&d=DwIFAw&c=clK7kQUTWtAVEOVIg >> vi0NU5BOUHhpN0H8p7CSfnc_gI&r=pOEltBBB0Tkd7ps2jHF3Rw&m=CjwAzA >> 9C4irLYtyTmA5pL1A9-8OpnnJfRm5prt3jY30&s=IOgSJbhLIqDth5hfwji8 >> 0Sn265ivYIaOg9ZejY9WXEI&e= >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> paraview-requ...@paraview.org >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> paraview-ow...@paraview.org >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of ParaView digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. file naming of downloadable data files (th.la...@arcor.de) >> 2. Re: PythonFullExample does not send any data (Andy Bauer) >> 3. Re: Using Probe Filter To Get The Average Value Around A >> Point (Jeremias Gonzalez) >> 4. Re: Using Probe Filter To Get The Average Value Around A >> Point (Moreland, Kenneth) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 18:32:54 +0100 (CET) >> From: th.la...@arcor.de >> To: paraview@paraview.org >> Subject: [Paraview] file naming of downloadable data files >> Message-ID: <173864583.16224.1517938374...@mail.vodafone.de> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 >> >> Hi all, >> >> the data files https://urldefense.proofpoint. >> com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.paraview.org_paraview-2Ddownloads >> _download.php-3Fsubmit-3DDownload-26version-3Dv5.4- >> 26type-3Dbinary-26os-3DSources-26downloadFile-3DParaViewData >> -2Dv5.4.1.tar.gz&d=DwIFAw&c=clK7kQUTWtAVEOVIgvi0NU5BOUHhpN0H >> 8p7CSfnc_gI&r=pOEltBBB0Tkd7ps2jHF3Rw&m=CjwAzA9C4irLYtyTmA5pL >> 1A9-8OpnnJfRm5prt3jY30&s=RIZnMnFOPOSN6pgZvN-RcuPn6FPrUByb7kI6Gy8ATtU&e= >> e.g. have a confusing file naming :( >> >> What's the intention for this? Thus I could hardly identify the wanted >> file :[ >> >> Many thanks for an explanation >> Thomas >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 2 >> Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 17:40:40 -0500 >> From: Andy Bauer <andy.ba...@kitware.com> >> To: "Michalke, Simon" <simon.micha...@fau.de> >> Cc: paraview@paraview.org >> Subject: Re: [Paraview] PythonFullExample does not send any data >> Message-ID: >> <CAMaOp+ErfV4gB9sd9Aft+902jJVkn7dhimiThbzOO2Qa3T-nJg@mail. >> gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> Hi Simon, >> >> I'm confused a to where the data is being sent from and to. If it's from >> the simulation and to the adaptor then all of that would get done before >> Catalyst would ever see it. If it's from the adaptor to Catalyst or to the >> PV GUI through the Live connection you'll probably want to look at >> coprocessing.py and grep through it for "live". I don't look too often at >> the Live sections of the code so it would take a bit of time to go through >> all of the details on it properly. >> >> Best, >> Andy >> >> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Michalke, Simon <simon.micha...@fau.de> >> wrote: >> >> > Thank you very much, it works now. >> > >> > Since I am getting the initial data via http and process it manually, is >> > there a way to "directly" open a connection and send data? I think the >> > coprocessor structure is not suitable for my case. Something like: >> > >> > con = openConnection() >> > >> > con.sendData(data) >> > con.sendData(data) >> > con.sendData(data) >> > >> > con.close() >> > >> > where data is something like vtkPolyData. Or, alternatively transfer the >> > grid at the beginning and only send the data as vtk*Array itself after >> > first initialization. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Simon >> > >> > >> > Am 2018-02-06 14:18, schrieb Andy Bauer: >> > >> >> In cpscript.py you will need to change the following line: >> >> coprocessor.EnableLiveVisualization(False, 1) >> >> >> >> to: >> >> coprocessor.EnableLiveVisualization(True, 1) >> >> >> >> As for building VTK objects through the Python API, the VTK Examples at >> >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lorense >> n.github.io_VTKExamples_site_Python_&d=DwIFAw&c=clK7kQUTWtA >> VEOVIgvi0NU5BOUHhpN0H8p7CSfnc_gI&r=pOEltBBB0Tkd7ps2jHF3Rw&m= >> CjwAzA9C4irLYtyTmA5pL1A9-8OpnnJfRm5prt3jY30&s=dGEuCERJsl5LRJ >> SGLNF4gQ1R2AixReuCwSAv-aynwv0&e= should have several >> >> will help you out. >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Andy >> >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 4:37 AM, Michalke, Simon <simon.micha...@fau.de >> > >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hello, >> >>> >> >>> I am trying to code a tool to send live data from a simulation to >> >>> paraview. I build my paraview with the latest superbuild and with >> system >> >>> python (3.4m). Then I tried to run the "PythonFullExample". After >> >>> un-commenting line 25 in fedriver.py: >> >>> coprocessor.addscript("cpscript.py") >> >>> the script still does not send any data. There are no error messages >> as >> >>> well. I made sure that paraview is listening to the correct port. >> >>> >> >>> In general, I cannot find any python example on how to attach values >> to a >> >>> poly element or a point. >> >>> >> >>> Regards, >> >>> Simon Michalke >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> Powered by www.kitware.com >> >>> >> >>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at >> >>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.kitw >> are.com_opensou&d=DwIFAw&c=clK7kQUTWtAVEOVIgvi0NU5BOUHhpN0H8 >> p7CSfnc_gI&r=pOEltBBB0Tkd7ps2jHF3Rw&m=CjwAzA9C4irLYtyTmA5pL1 >> A9-8OpnnJfRm5prt3jY30&s=MQItyjuJK3BpTpDHXMSCoJgREBQxVS5OO8y5G8oBenU&e= >> >>> rce/opensource.html >> >>> >> >>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: >> >>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__paraview >> .org_Wiki_ParaView&d=DwIFAw&c=clK7kQUTWtAVEOVIgvi0NU5BOUHhpN >> 0H8p7CSfnc_gI&r=pOEltBBB0Tkd7ps2jHF3Rw&m=CjwAzA9C4irLYtyTmA5 >> pL1A9-8OpnnJfRm5prt3jY30&s=vWF8x66gwF7IEg4rcqUU7DV5QDs-PwP0lZ32XdjJwag&e= >> >>> >> >>> Search the list archives at: https://urldefense.proofpoint. >> com/v2/url?u=http-3A__markmail.org_search_-3Fq-3DParaView&d= >> DwIFAw&c=clK7kQUTWtAVEOVIgvi0NU5BOUHhpN0H8p7CSfnc_gI&r=pOElt >> BBB0Tkd7ps2jHF3Rw&m=CjwAzA9C4irLYtyTmA5pL1A9-8OpnnJfRm5prt3j >> Y30&s=XYxfP2NVK1WSIVvpELwtWFTp4uJiB1surn4mkpHcgsQ&e= >> >>> >> >>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: >> >>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__paravie >> w.org_mailman_listinfo_paraview&d=DwIFAw&c=clK7kQUTWtAVEOVIg >> vi0NU5BOUHhpN0H8p7CSfnc_gI&r=pOEltBBB0Tkd7ps2jHF3Rw&m=CjwAzA >> 9C4irLYtyTmA5pL1A9-8OpnnJfRm5prt3jY30&s=IOgSJbhLIqDth5hfwji8 >> 0Sn265ivYIaOg9ZejY9WXEI&e= >> >>> >> >>> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__ >> paraview.org_pipermail_paraview_attachments_20180206_9fee58a >> d_attachment-2D0001.html&d=DwIFAw&c=clK7kQUTWtAVEOVIgvi0N >> U5BOUHhpN0H8p7CSfnc_gI&r=pOEltBBB0Tkd7ps2jHF3Rw&m=CjwAzA9C4i >> rLYtyTmA5pL1A9-8OpnnJfRm5prt3jY30&s=r7jWitWebUmGIVApLUKRS8pI >> xEAb6wd6w7klBGPTr34&e=> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 3 >> Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 17:21:37 -0800 >> From: Jeremias Gonzalez <jgonzale...@ucmerced.edu> >> To: "Moreland, Kenneth" <kmo...@sandia.gov>, ParaView >> <paraview@paraview.org> >> Subject: Re: [Paraview] Using Probe Filter To Get The Average Value >> Around A Point >> Message-ID: <607343c2-fbc3-6dfb-ec3d-0cc0182e5...@ucmerced.edu> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed >> >> Thank you very much for your explanations and suggestions. Responses >> interspersed below. >> >> On 2/5/2018 4:57 PM, Moreland, Kenneth wrote: >> > Jeremias, >> > >> > When you set a radius and number of points in the probe filter, then >> the filter will randomly sample the volume within the defined sphere the >> number of times requested. The resulting values are the field values at >> those randomly sampled locations. > >> > An easy way to get an average of your samples is to run the result of >> the probe filter through the descriptive statistics filter. Look at the >> "Statistical Model" table and it will report the mean value for each field. >> (Note that if you are using ParaView 5.4 there is a bug, #17627, that shows >> the Statistical Model table wrong by default. You have to also change the >> Composite Data Set Index parameter in the Display part of the properties >> panel to select only the Derived Statistics block.) >> > >> > A couple of caveats to this approach. First, because the sampling is >> random, don't expect the exact same answer every time you run it. Second, >> if one of the samples happens to lie outside of the mesh, that sample will >> be filled with 0's for all fields. That will throw off the average value. >> >> Is there a probe setting that will simply grab all the points living in >> the original mesh within the radius of the sphere I choose? >> >> > >> > That said, another approach you might want to take is to first filter >> the data in a way that blurs out the noise first. One way you can do that >> is to run the Point Volume Interpolator filter. Change the Kernel to >> something like Gaussian (the default Voronoi filter will not do the >> averaging that you want). Set the radius appropriately. You can then probe >> the resulting data set with a single value (radius 0) and immediate see the >> "averaged" result. >> > >> > -Ken >> >> I don't seem to be finding any information on what exactly the Gaussian >> kernel does with the data, so how close is it to the plain averaging I >> would like it to be doing? >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 4 >> Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 02:45:33 +0000 >> From: "Moreland, Kenneth" <kmo...@sandia.gov> >> To: Jeremias Gonzalez <jgonzale...@ucmerced.edu> >> Cc: ParaView <paraview@paraview.org> >> Subject: Re: [Paraview] Using Probe Filter To Get The Average Value >> Around A Point >> Message-ID: <352a5591-ba22-4421-a2c3-1adda46d2...@sandia.gov> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> As far as I know, there is no way to get the probe filter to get all >> points within a radius as you describe. You may instead consider the Point >> Data to Cell Data Filter. That will for each cell take the values of all >> attached points and average them. >> >> The point volume interpolator filter will create a grid (by default >> 100^3) and, in gaussian kernel mode, will ?splat? a gaussian function onto >> the grid from every point. Another way to think of it is that a 3D gaussian >> function is convolved with a 3D function comprising an impulse function at >> every point in the mesh scaled by the field value (and then sampled on the >> grid). >> >> -Ken >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> > On Feb 6, 2018, at 8:21 PM, Jeremias Gonzalez <jgonzale...@ucmerced.edu> >> wrote: >> > >> > Thank you very much for your explanations and suggestions. Responses >> interspersed below. >> > >> >> On 2/5/2018 4:57 PM, Moreland, Kenneth wrote: >> >> Jeremias, >> >> When you set a radius and number of points in the probe filter, then >> the filter will randomly sample the volume within the defined sphere the >> number of times requested. The resulting values are the field values at >> those randomly sampled locations. > >> >> An easy way to get an average of your samples is to run the result of >> the probe filter through the descriptive statistics filter. Look at the >> "Statistical Model" table and it will report the mean value for each field. >> (Note that if you are using ParaView 5.4 there is a bug, #17627, that shows >> the Statistical Model table wrong by default. You have to also change the >> Composite Data Set Index parameter in the Display part of the properties >> panel to select only the Derived Statistics block.) >> >> A couple of caveats to this approach. First, because the sampling is >> random, don't expect the exact same answer every time you run it. Second, >> if one of the samples happens to lie outside of the mesh, that sample will >> be filled with 0's for all fields. That will throw off the average value. >> > >> > Is there a probe setting that will simply grab all the points living in >> the original mesh within the radius of the sphere I choose? >> > >> >> That said, another approach you might want to take is to first filter >> the data in a way that blurs out the noise first. One way you can do that >> is to run the Point Volume Interpolator filter. Change the Kernel to >> something like Gaussian (the default Voronoi filter will not do the >> averaging that you want). Set the radius appropriately. You can then probe >> the resulting data set with a single value (radius 0) and immediate see the >> "averaged" result. >> >> -Ken >> > >> > I don't seem to be finding any information on what exactly the Gaussian >> kernel does with the data, so how close is it to the plain averaging I >> would like it to be doing? >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Subject: Digest Footer >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Powered by www.kitware.com >> >> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.kitw >> are.com_opensource_opensource.html&d=DwIFAw&c=clK7kQUTWtAVEO >> VIgvi0NU5BOUHhpN0H8p7CSfnc_gI&r=pOEltBBB0Tkd7ps2jHF3Rw&m=Cjw >> AzA9C4irLYtyTmA5pL1A9-8OpnnJfRm5prt3jY30&s=v1osG4Wmtb71PKFBp >> HSbX6y99dLXmsb9bDmz2oOAFqE&e= >> >> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__paraview >> .org_Wiki_ParaView&d=DwIFAw&c=clK7kQUTWtAVEOVIgvi0NU5BOUHhpN >> 0H8p7CSfnc_gI&r=pOEltBBB0Tkd7ps2jHF3Rw&m=CjwAzA9C4irLYtyTmA5 >> pL1A9-8OpnnJfRm5prt3jY30&s=vWF8x66gwF7IEg4rcqUU7DV5QDs-PwP0lZ32XdjJwag&e= >> >> Search the list archives at: https://urldefense.proofpoint. >> com/v2/url?u=http-3A__markmail.org_search_-3Fq-3DParaView&d= >> DwIFAw&c=clK7kQUTWtAVEOVIgvi0NU5BOUHhpN0H8p7CSfnc_gI&r=pOElt >> BBB0Tkd7ps2jHF3Rw&m=CjwAzA9C4irLYtyTmA5pL1A9-8OpnnJfRm5prt3j >> Y30&s=XYxfP2NVK1WSIVvpELwtWFTp4uJiB1surn4mkpHcgsQ&e= >> >> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__paravie >> w.org_mailman_listinfo_paraview&d=DwIFAw&c=clK7kQUTWtAVEOVIg >> vi0NU5BOUHhpN0H8p7CSfnc_gI&r=pOEltBBB0Tkd7ps2jHF3Rw&m=CjwAzA >> 9C4irLYtyTmA5pL1A9-8OpnnJfRm5prt3jY30&s=IOgSJbhLIqDth5hfwji8 >> 0Sn265ivYIaOg9ZejY9WXEI&e= >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> End of ParaView Digest, Vol 166, Issue 7 >> **************************************** >> _______________________________________________ >> Powered by www.kitware.com >> >> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.kitw >> are.com_opensource_opensource.html&d=DwIFAw&c=clK7kQUTWtAVEO >> VIgvi0NU5BOUHhpN0H8p7CSfnc_gI&r=pOEltBBB0Tkd7ps2jHF3Rw&m=Cjw >> AzA9C4irLYtyTmA5pL1A9-8OpnnJfRm5prt3jY30&s=v1osG4Wmtb71PKFBp >> HSbX6y99dLXmsb9bDmz2oOAFqE&e= >> >> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__paraview >> .org_Wiki_ParaView&d=DwIFAw&c=clK7kQUTWtAVEOVIgvi0NU5BOUHhpN >> 0H8p7CSfnc_gI&r=pOEltBBB0Tkd7ps2jHF3Rw&m=CjwAzA9C4irLYtyTmA5 >> pL1A9-8OpnnJfRm5prt3jY30&s=vWF8x66gwF7IEg4rcqUU7DV5QDs-PwP0lZ32XdjJwag&e= >> >> Search the list archives at: https://urldefense.proofpoint. >> com/v2/url?u=http-3A__markmail.org_search_-3Fq-3DParaView&d= >> DwIFAw&c=clK7kQUTWtAVEOVIgvi0NU5BOUHhpN0H8p7CSfnc_gI&r=pOElt >> BBB0Tkd7ps2jHF3Rw&m=CjwAzA9C4irLYtyTmA5pL1A9-8OpnnJfRm5prt3j >> Y30&s=XYxfP2NVK1WSIVvpELwtWFTp4uJiB1surn4mkpHcgsQ&e= >> >> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__paravie >> w.org_mailman_listinfo_paraview&d=DwIFAw&c=clK7kQUTWtAVEOVIg >> vi0NU5BOUHhpN0H8p7CSfnc_gI&r=pOEltBBB0Tkd7ps2jHF3Rw&m=CjwAzA >> 9C4irLYtyTmA5pL1A9-8OpnnJfRm5prt3jY30&s=IOgSJbhLIqDth5hfwji8 >> 0Sn265ivYIaOg9ZejY9WXEI&e= >> > >
_______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: https://paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview