On Sun, Apr 14, 2013, Tom C wrote: > From: Aahz Maruch <a...@pobox.com> >> >>> I should add, following the line of thought, that any/every camera is >>> capable in the hands of one who knows how to best use it. >> >> That's half-true, at best. My Nikon P7100 just isn't good for low-light >> photography (although it's considerably better than my previous Canon >> A710). Similarly, no camera is good if you hate to use it (you can argue >> that it's capable, I suppose, but that smells of "wrong question"). > > Really? > > You show me one camera that cannot produce a pleasing image and I'll > show you a million that are.
[adding in Tom's followup from a separate post] > I wasn't referring to a specific use for a specific camera. I was > speaking in general terms, that being, any camera is capable of > producing a pleasing and decent image, unless it's downright > defective. That just brings you up to half-true. ;-) My point is that any camera you refuse to use because you hate it can't produce a pleasing and decent image. Like you, I'm talking in general terms, obviously one can haul the camera out and take a picture -- but if your inclination is to leave it in the closet gathering dust instead of taking pictures... -- Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6 http://rule6.info/ <*> <*> <*> Help a hearing-impaired person: http://rule6.info/hearing.html -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
