Interesting... I didn't know such a technology already exists. Nor I had
heard about the proposed regulation.
Did NYT fire all their editors?
I was a bit confused by a few things (of which most are what the editor
should have noticed, such as #2 and #3):
1. Paul, I was expecting that you would refute this statement:
" And the proposed mandate for notification technology in cars misses the
targeted population, because so few parents of young children buy new
cars.” -- First, some parents of young children are forced to buy a new
car once the child is born, especially, if it is #3 and above. And even if
most parents buy used cars, it is obvious that all new cars will soon
become used (and eventually old).
2. There is a weird way how the text is broken into small paragraphs.
The most obvious is the paragraph starting with "General Motors
and Nissan..." is broken into two in the middle of the thought.
The last three paragraphs also should have been one, me thinks.
And "“The brain process is the same,” ...." should have been with the
previous paragraph.
3. "One such system, the VitaSense, uses low-power radio to sense movement
and breathing."
I suspect the word "waves" is missing ("radio waves", not "radio").
Sorry, I just couldn't help noticing these.
Igor
ann sanfedele Fri, 27 Oct 2017 17:02:06 -0700 wrote:
It is hard to imagine that this happens.. but it does too often :-(
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/26/automobiles/wheels/forgetting-a-child-in-a-back-seat-can-kill-cars-may-soon-warn-you.html
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
