https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376845
Petr Pisar <ppi...@redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Blocks| |182235 (FE-Legal)
Resolution|NOTABUG |---
Keywords| |Reopened
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar <ppi...@redhat.com> ---
I don't agree with your resolution.
c/ppport.h is "GPL+ or Artistic". Because Fedora does not permit Artistic, the
file is compiled as "GPL+". And if you link GPL+ code into an Artistic 2.0 code
(lib/Params/Validate/XS.c), the result is tainted by GPL. Thus the binary
package must state GPL+ in the license tag.
Raising to the Fedora legal team for a decision.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182235
[Bug 182235] Fedora Legal Tracker
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4SMKPTOKPQ3LQKI24ZXC3FKJQTXLRREH/
