Saneesh Apte wrote:
I think I found two bugs (and I hope I am not wasting everyone's time).
One is minor: the base type of a boolean[] is java.sql.Types.BIT
instead or java.sql.Types.BOOLEAN. At the very least shouldn't these be
aliases for the same type?
Types.BOOLEAN does not exist before JDBC3. Client code can use either,
but we have to pick one or the other when returning a value, so we
return BIT.
And secondly the returned type from a smallint[] is an Integer[]
instead of a Short[].
smallint is a Types.SMALLINT which is mapped to java.lang.Integer by the
JDBC spec. See appendix B of the spec:
Note – The JDBC 1.0 specification defined the Java object mapping for the
SMALLINT and TINYINT JDBC types to be Integer. The Java language did not
include the Byte and Short data types when the JDBC 1.0 specification was
finalized. The mapping of SMALLINT and TINYINT to Integer is maintained to
preserve backwards compatibility.
-O
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
