"Vern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote in Msg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> it can't *hurt* to have the group ... > > I respectfully disagree with you, Marc. :) > > The PGSQL* hierarchy is now well distributed, and there is no need > for a comp.* group. If anything, the ungated comp.* group will > confuse newbies into thinking that that is the best forum for > PostGreSQL advice ... instead of the PGSQL.* hierarchy. None of > the developers and power users of these lists will be answering > questions in the comp.* group, if created, so it would be better > to not create the group at all. I still haven't decided which way to vote. I'm lingering in between NO and ABSTAIN. I was originally in favor of a single, non-gated Postgresql newsgroup in the comp* hierarchy. I'm no longer sure if it would be a good thing or not. The proponent certainly left a bad taste in my mouth after his little crossposting stunt - but I will still vote on the *proposal*, and not the *proponent*. -- Bill ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org