On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 at 10:20, Joel Jacobson <j...@compiler.org> wrote:
> Foreign key constraint names have been given the same names as the > referenced tables. > While I agree this could be a simple approach in many real cases for having easy to understand FK constraint names, I wonder if for illustration and explaining the feature if it might work better to use names that are completely unique so that it's crystal clear that the names are constraint names, not table names.
