On Mon, 27 Jun 2022 at 11:12, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> More generally, I'm -0.5 on the feature. > I prefer to force using SQL-compliant queries, and also not take bad > habits. > As to forcing SQL-complaint queries, that ship sailed a long time ago: Postgres allows but does not enforce the use of SQL-compliant queries, and many of its important features are extensions anyway, so forcing SQL compliant queries is out of the question (although I could see the utility of a mode where it warns or errors on non-compliant queries, at least in principle). As to bad habits, I'm having trouble understanding. Why do you think leaving the alias off a subquery is a bad habit (assuming it were allowed)? If the name is never used, why are we required to supply it?
