> "Regina Obe" <l...@pcorp.us> writes: > > My proposal is this. If you think it's a good enough idea I can work > > up a patch for this. > > Extensions currently are allowed to specify a requires in the control file. > > I propose to use this information, to allow replacement of phrases > > @extschema_nameofextension@ as a variable, where nameofextension has > > to be one of the extensions listed in the requires. > > I have a distinct sense of deja vu here. I think this idea, or something > isomorphic to it, was previously discussed with some other syntax details. > I'm too lazy to go searching the archives right now, but I suggest that you try to > find that discussion and see if the discussed syntax seems better or worse than > what you mention. > > I think it might've been along the line of @extschema:nameofextension@, > which seems like it might be superior because colon isn't a valid identifier > character so there's less risk of ambiguity. > > regards, tom lane I found the old discussion I recalled having and Stephen had suggested using
@extschema{'postgis'}@ On this thread -- https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160425232251.GR10850@tamriel.snowman .net Is that the one you remember? Thanks, Regina