On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 11:36:34AM -0700, Jacob Champion wrote: > Maybe I should just add a basic Assert here, to trip if someone adds a > new SASL mechanism, and point that lucky person to this thread with a > comment?
I am beginning to look at the last version proposed, which has been marked as RfC. Does this patch need a refresh in light of a9e9a9f and 0873b2d? The changes for libpq_append_conn_error() should be straight-forward. The CF bot is still happy. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
