> On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 11:46:50PM -0500, Regina Obe wrote: > > > Re: Sandro Santilli > > > > I'm attaching an updated version of the patch. This time the patch > > > > is tested. Nothing changes unless the .control file for the > > > > subject extension doesn't have a "wildcard_upgrades = true" statement. > > > > > > > > When wildcard upgrades are enabled, a file with a "%" symbol as > > > > the "source" part of the upgrade path will match any version and > > > > > > Fwiw I believe wildcard_upgrades isn't necessary in the .control file. > > > If there are no % files, none would be used anyway, and if there > > > are, it's > > clear > > > it's meant as wildcard since % won't appear in any remotely sane > > > version number. > > > > I also like the idea of skipping the wildcard_upgrades syntax. > > Then there is no need to have a conditional control file for PG 16 vs. > > older versions. > > Here we go. Attached a version of the patch with no "wildcard_upgrades" > controlling it. > > --strk;
I think you should increment the version number on the file name of this patch. You had one earlier called 0001-... The one before that was missing a version number entirely. Maybe call this 0003-... Thanks, Regina