Hi, On 2022-11-16 21:58:39 -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 07:48:14PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote: > > I've used this a bunch on personal branches, and I think it's the way to > > go. It doesn't take long, saves a lot of cycles when one pushes something > > broken. Starts to runs the CompilerWarnings task after a minimal amount of > > sanity checking, instead of having to wait for a task running all tests, > > without the waste of running it immediately and failing all the different > > configurations, which takes forever. > > Well, I don't hate it. > > But I don't think you should call "ccache -z":
Agreed - that was really just for "development" of the task. I also don't like my "cores_script". Not quite sure yet how to do that more cleanly. Greetings, Andres Freund