On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 1:44 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I wrote: > > Still wondering if there's really no CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPT anywhere > > else in this loop. > > I did some experimentation using the test case Jakub presented > to start with, and verified that that loop does respond promptly > to control-C even in HEAD. So there are CFI(s) in the loop as > I thought, and we don't need another.
OK. Although an extra CFI isn't such a bad thing, either. > What we do need is some more work on nearby comments. I'll > see about that and push it. Great! -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
