On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 8:36 PM Peter Eisentraut < peter.eisentr...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > On 15.11.22 11:31, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > On 14.11.22 08:25, John Naylor wrote: > >> Regarding the patch, it looks good overall. My only suggestion would > >> be to add a regression test for just below and just above overflow, at > >> least for int2. > > > > ok > > This was a valuable suggestion, because this found some breakage. In > particular, the handling of grammar-level literals that overflow to > "Float" was not correct. (The radix prefix was simply stripped and > forgotten.) So I added a bunch more tests for this. Here is a new patch.
Looks good to me. -- John Naylor EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
