On 24.11.22 10:13, David Rowley wrote:
On Thu, 24 Nov 2022 at 21:35, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentr...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
My code follows the style used for parsing the decimal integers.
Keeping that consistent is valuable I think.  I think the proposed
change makes the code significantly harder to understand.  Also, what
you are suggesting here would amount to an attempt to make parsing
hexadecimal integers even faster than parsing decimal integers.  Is that
useful?

Isn't it being faster one of the major use cases for this feature?

Never thought about it that way.

I
remember many years ago and several jobs ago when working with SQL
Server being able to speed up importing data using hexadecimal
DATETIMEs. I can't think why else you might want to represent a
DATETIME as a hexstring, so I assumed this was a large part of the use
case for INTs in PostgreSQL. Are you telling me that better
performance is not something anyone will want out of this feature?

This isn't about datetimes but about integers.



Reply via email to