On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 3:33 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 11:59 PM Juan José Santamaría Flecha
> <juanjo.santama...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > TL;DR; What I want to show through this example is that Windows ACP is not 
> > modified by setlocale(), it can only be done through the Windows registry 
> > and only in recent releases.
>
> Thanks, that was helpful, and so was that SO link.
>
> So it sounds like I should forget about the v3-0002 patch, but the
> v3-0001 and v3-0003 patches might have a future.  And it sounds like
> we might need to investigate maybe defending ourselves against the ACP
> being different than what we expect (ie not matching the database
> encoding)?  Did I understand correctly that you're looking into that?

I'm going to withdraw this entry.  The sooner we get something like
0001 into a release, the sooner the world will be rid of PostgreSQL
clusters initialised with the bad old locale names that the manual
very clearly tells you not to use for databases.... but I don't
understand this ACP/registry vs database encoding stuff and how it
relates to the use of BCP47 locale names, which puts me off changing
anything until we do.


Reply via email to