On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 05:25:44PM +0100, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote: > I like the idea of comparing the full page (and not just the LSN) but > I'm not sure that adding the pageinspect dependency is a good thing. > > What about extracting the block directly from the relation file and > comparing it with the one extracted from the WAL? (We'd need to skip the > first 8 bytes to skip the LSN though).
Byte-by-byte counting for the page hole? The page checksum would matter as well, FWIW, as it is not set in WAL and a FPW logged in WAL means that the page got modified. It means that it could have been flushed, updating its pd_lsn and its pd_checksum on the way. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
