Jacob Champion <jchamp...@timescale.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 7:53 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I also fear that it will break
>> a bunch of use-cases that work fine today, which are exactly the
>> ones for which we originally defined pg_dump as *not* committing
>> to a particular extension version.
> Right, I think it would have to be opt-in. Say, a new control file
> option dump_version or some such.
That would require all the installed extensions to cope with this
the same way, which does not seem like a great assumption.
regards, tom lane
