On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 7:27 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> skink seems to have found a problem:
>
> ==2011873== VALGRINDERROR-BEGIN
> ==2011873== Syscall param epoll_wait(events) points to unaddressable byte(s)
> ==2011873==    at 0x4D8DC73: epoll_wait (epoll_wait.c:30)
> ==2011873==    by 0x55CA49: WaitEventSetWaitBlock (latch.c:1527)
> ==2011873==    by 0x55D591: WaitEventSetWait (latch.c:1473)
> ==2011873==    by 0x4F2B28: ServerLoop (postmaster.c:1729)
> ==2011873==    by 0x4F3E85: PostmasterMain (postmaster.c:1452)
> ==2011873==    by 0x42643C: main (main.c:200)
> ==2011873==  Address 0x7b1e620 is 1,360 bytes inside a recently re-allocated 
> block of size 8,192 alloc'd
> ==2011873==    at 0x48407B4: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:381)
> ==2011873==    by 0x6D9D30: AllocSetContextCreateInternal (aset.c:446)
> ==2011873==    by 0x4F2D9B: PostmasterMain (postmaster.c:614)
> ==2011873==    by 0x42643C: main (main.c:200)
> ==2011873==
> ==2011873== VALGRINDERROR-END

Repro'd here on Valgrind.  Oh, that's interesting.  WaitEventSetWait()
wants to use an internal buffer of the size given to the constructor
function, but passes the size of the caller's output buffer to
epoll_wait() and friends.  Perhaps it should use Min(nevents,
set->nevents_space).  I mean, I should have noticed that, but I think
that's arguably a pre-existing bug in the WES code, or at least an
unhelpful interface.  Thinking...


Reply via email to