I've accumulated another collection of various questions and comments. As a
side note I'm getting a good feeling about this patch, those part I've read so
far looks good to me.

* I've suddenly realized one could use pseudo types for variables, and
  it not always works. E.g.:

    =# create variable pseudo_array anyarray;
    =# select pseudo_array;
     pseudo_array
    --------------
     NULL

    =# let pseudo_array = ARRAY[1, 2, 3];
    ERROR:  42804: target session variable is of type anyarray but expression 
is of type integer[]
    LOCATION:  svariableStartupReceiver, svariableReceiver.c:79

    =# create variable pseudo_unknown unknown;
    =# select pseudo_unknown;
    ERROR:  XX000: failed to find conversion function from unknown to text
    LOCATION:  coerce_type, parse_coerce.c:542

  Is it supposed to be like this, or something is missing?

* I think it was already mentioned in the thread, there seems to be not a
  single usage of CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in session_variable.c . But some number
  of loops over the sessionvars are implemented, are they always going to be
  small enough to not make any troubles?

* sync_sessionvars_all explains why is it necessary to copy xact_recheck_varids:

                 When we check the variables, the system cache can be 
invalidated,
                 and xact_recheck_varids can be enhanced.

  I'm not quite following what the "enhancement" part is about? Is
  xact_recheck_varids could be somehow updated concurrently with the loop?

* A small typo

        diff --git a/src/backend/commands/session_variable.c 
b/src/backend/commands/session_variable.c
        --- a/src/backend/commands/session_variable.c
        +++ b/src/backend/commands/session_variable.c
        @@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ sync_sessionvars_all(bool filter_lxid)

                        /*
                         * When we check the variables, the system cache can be 
invalidated,
        -        * and xac_recheck_varids can be enhanced. We want to iterate
        +        * and xact_recheck_varids can be enhanced. We want to iterate

NOTE: The commentaries above were made based on the previous patch version, but
it looks like those aspects were not changed.


Reply via email to