> On 22 Feb 2023, at 21:55, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> writes: >>> On 22 Feb 2023, at 21:33, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: >>> On 2023-02-22 15:10:11 +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >>>> Rebased patch to handle breakage of v2 due to bd8d453e9b. > >>> I think we probably should just apply this? The current behaviour doesn't >>> seem >>> right, and I don't see a downside of the new behaviour? > >> Agreed, I can't think of a regression test where we wouldn't want this. My >> only concern was if any of the ECPG tests were doing something odd that would >> break from this but I can't see anything. > > +1. I was a bit surprised to realize that we might not count such > a case as a failure.
Done that way, thanks! -- Daniel Gustafsson
