> On 24 Feb 2023, at 16:19, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> writes: >> I happened to notice that there were a few references to guc.c regarding >> variables, which with the recent refactoring in 0a20ff54f have become stale. >> Attached is a trivial patch to instead point to guc_tables.c. > > Hmm, I think you may have done an overenthusiastic replacement here.
Fair enough, I only changed those places I felt referenced variables, or their definition, in guc_tables.c but I agree that there is a lot of greyzone in the interpretation. > Perhaps you could use "the GUC mechanisms" in these places, but it's a bit > longer than "guc.c". Leaving such references alone seems OK too. I've opted for mostly leaving them in the attached v2. -- Daniel Gustafsson
v2-0001-Fix-outdated-references-to-guc.c.patch
Description: Binary data
