> On 6 Mar 2023, at 21:55, Gregory Stark (as CFM) <stark....@gmail.com> wrote: > > It looks like Daniel Gustafsson, Andres, and Tom have all weighed in > on this patch with at least a neutral comment (+-0 from Andres :)
I think the concept of a login event trigger has merits, even though it's kind of a niche use case. > It looks like the main concern was breaking physical replicas and that > there was consensus that as long as single-user mode worked that it > was ok? Having a way to not rely on single-user mode and not causing an unacceptable performance hit (which judging by recent benchmarks might not be an issue?). I still intend to revisit this and I hope to get to it during this CF. -- Daniel Gustafsson
