On 21/03/2023 08:15, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 20.03.23 10:40, Sébastien Lardière wrote:
About option_parse_int(), actually, strtoint() is used, do we need a option_parse_ul() fonction ?

For the option parsing, I propose the attached patch.  This follows the structure of option_parse_int(), so in the future it could be extracted and refactored in the same way, if there is more need.


ok for me, it accept 0x values and refuse wrong values

committed

thanks,


--
Sébastien



Reply via email to