On Tue, 5 Jul 2022 at 11:29, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > No, that's not acceptable. CREATE OR REPLACE should always produce > exactly the same final state of the object, but in this case we cannot > change the underlying function if the operator already exists.
It sounds like this patch isn't the direction to go in. I don't know if IF NOT EXISTS is better but that design discussion should probably happen after this commitfest. I'm sorry but I guess I'll mark this patch Rejected. -- Gregory Stark As Commitfest Manager
