On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 10:56:26AM +0000, fujii.y...@df.mitsubishielectric.co.jp wrote: > > Yes, good. Did we never push down aggregates before? I thought we > > pushed down partitionwise aggregates already, and such a check should > > already be done. If the check isn't there, it should be. > Yes. The last version of this patch(and original postgres_fdw) checks if > user-defined aggregate depends some extension which is contained in > 'extensions'. > But, in the last version of this patch, there is no such check for > aggpartialfn of user-defined aggregate. So, I will add such check to this > patch. > I think that this modification is easy to do .
Good, so our existing code is correct and the patch just needs adjustment. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Embrace your flaws. They make you human, rather than perfect, which you will never be.
