On 2023-07-13 09:12, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 05:46:31PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 04:52:38PM +0900, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
If the behavior is unexpected, we need to change the current code.
I have created a patch for the areas that I felt needed to be changed.
- 0001-change-the-die-condition-in-generate-wait_event_type.patch
 (In addition to the above, "$continue = ",\n";" doesn't appear to be
necessary.)

    die "wait event names must start with 'WAIT_EVENT_'"
      if ( $trimmedwaiteventname eq $waiteventenumname
-       && $waiteventenumname !~ /^LWLock/
-       && $waiteventenumname !~ /^Lock/);
-   $continue = ",\n";
+       && $waitclassname !~ /^WaitEventLWLock$/
+       && $waitclassname !~ /^WaitEventLock$/);

Indeed, this looks wrong as-is.  $waiteventenumname refers to the
names of the enum elements, so we could just apply a filter based on
the class names in full.  The second check in for the generation of
the c/h files uses the class names.

At the end, I have gone with an event simpler way and removed the
checks for LWLock and Lock as their hardcoded values marked as DOCONLY
satisfy this check.  The second check when generating the C and header
code has also been simplified a bit to use an exact match with the
class name.

Thanks for your quick response. I'll rebase for the commit.

Regards,
--
Masahiro Ikeda
NTT DATA CORPORATION


Reply via email to