On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 05:04:28PM +1100, Peter Smith wrote: > Having a GUC hook for the "max_slot_wal_keep_size" seemed OK to me. If > the user overrides a GUC value (admittedly, maybe there is no reason > why they would want to) then at least the hook will give an error, > rather than us silently overwriting the user's value with -1. > > So, patch v4 LGTM, except it is better to include a test case.
Where's this v4? I may be missing, but it does not seem to be attached to this thread.. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
