On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 at 23:30, Junwang Zhao <zhjw...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 10:44 PM Japin Li <japi...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 at 22:37, Junwang Zhao <zhjw...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 10:25 PM Japin Li <japi...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> I try to set idle_in_transaction_session_timeout after begin transaction, >> >> it changes immediately, so I think transaction_timeout should also be take >> >> immediately. >> > >> > Ah, right, idle_in_transaction_session_timeout is set after the set >> > command finishes and before the backend send *ready for query* >> > to the client, so the value of the GUC is already set before >> > next command. >> > >> >> I mean, is it possible to set transaction_timeout before next comand? >> > Yeah, it's possible, set transaction_timeout in the when it first > goes into *idle in transaction* mode, see the attached files. >
Thanks for updating the patch, LGTM. -- Regrads, Japin Li ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co., Ltd.
